homeDavide Castelvecchi's portfolioexclusivesabout sciencewriter.org


October 20, 2006

Would String Theory Truly Realize Einstein’s Dream?

buy viagra lowest price cheap generic viagra order cialis in us order cheap viagra online cheap cialis in canada buy discount cialis viagra price find cheap viagra online generic viagra low cost viagra buy sildenafil in canada erectile dysfunction buying generic viagra cheap cialis from canada cialis 10mg buy viagra online buy sildenafil cheap buy cheapest cialis cialis rx order viagra no prescription buying viagra buying cialis online buy viagra from india cialis cheapest price order cialis cheap online order no rx cialis cialis 10 mg overnight viagra tablet viagra buy generic cialis online cialis bangkok buy generic viagra viagra canada find viagra online buy and purchase sildenafil online cheap generic cialis viagra rx no prescription cialis find cialis 50 mg viagra viagra vs cialis buy sildenafil online order cialis without prescription cheap viagra online cialis information viagra cost 100 mg viagra purchase viagra viagra viagra from canada buy viagra internet drug viagra online purchase order cialis no rx discount cialis discount viagra discount viagra without prescription viagra without rx certified viagra find discount viagra cialis no online prescription cost of viagra find cialis without prescription buy discount viagra online buy cheap cialis lowest price cialis viagra pharmacy online viagra cheap sale viagra order viagra online cheap cialis tablet order cialis overnight delivery buy cialis low price cheap viagra without prescription cheapest cialis price viagra online without prescription buy sildenafil low cost compare viagra prices online buy cialis on line buy cialis generic impotence viagra tablets buy viagra generic cialis buy viagra low price viagra purchase best price for viagra 25mg viagra buy cialis from india cialis drug order viagra on internet low cost cialis buy discount viagra impotence treatment viagra pill order viagra from us buy sildenafil in uk overnight cialis cialis soft tab viagra medication cialis cheap impotence pills discount cialis online cheapest cialis online order cialis from canada cialis no prescription viagra cheap drug cheap viagra tablets buy viagra without prescription viagra online pharmacy viagra approved find cheap cialis cost cialis buy viagra on line cialis 20 mg buy cialis cheap cheapest viagra free cialis buy cheap cialis online pharmacy cialis cialis without rx cialis overnight shipping compare cialis prices online cheap cialis overnight delivery cialis tablets 20 mg cialis order viagra from canada cheap viagra from usa buy cheap viagra internet cheapest cialis 10 mg cialis purchase cialis buy sildenafil citrate cheap cialis no prescription order generic viagra cialis online cheap cheap cialis on internet drug cialis buy sildenafil internet cialis from india no rx cialis viagra cheapest price where to buy cialis order cialis in canada cialis medication cialis pharmacy discount cialis no rx cialis no rx required viagra overnight shipping cialis sales buy cialis from canada cialis prescription cheap viagra in uk purchase cialis overnight delivery cialis price where to buy viagra viagra no rx required cheap viagra overnight delivery viagra india buying generic cialis cialis malaysia cialis pill cialis for order cialis soft order viagra in canada generic viagra online cialis for sale impotence medication online viagra viagra soft viagra pharmacy purchase viagra overnight delivery buy cialis on internet cialis canada order discount cialis online buy viagra overnight delivery cheapest viagra price buy cialis from us cheap cialis from usa generic cialis cheap viagra no rx lowest price for cialis buy sildenafil online without a prescription viagra vendors cost of cialis generic viagra cheap cialis free delivery viagra in malaysia viagra uk find cialis online order viagra without prescription find discount viagra online cheap cialis from uk drug viagra cialis in uk cialis without a prescription viagra in australia find no rx cialis drug cialis online purchase cialis free sample buy cialis internet viagra generic find cheap viagra cheapest generic cialis online find cheap cialis online compare cialis prices order viagra no prescription required viagra us cheap viagra in usa find discount cialis purchase cialis no rx no prescription viagra cialis online viagra no online prescription fda approved cialis cheap cialis pharmacy buy viagra no prescription required cialis side effects viagra in uk viagra no prescription viagra in us cialis pharmacy online find viagra cheapest generic cialis cost viagra buy viagra cheap buy cialis in canada buy cialis no prescription required buy cialis us order cialis from us 100mg viagra free viagra find discount cialis online cheap viagra cialis buy online cialis overnight buy sildenafil canada cialis 20mg cheapest cialis prices viagra without prescription order cheap viagra cheap price viagra buy no rx viagra purchase viagra no rx pharmacy viagra find viagra no prescription required cheapest generic viagra cialis in malaysia cialis purchase buy cialis lowest price order no rx viagra cheapest generic viagra online order viagra cheap cialis where to order viagra fda approved viagra buy no rx cialis purchase viagra without prescription cheap cialis no rx cialis online stores cheap cialis in uk find cialis on internet certified cialis price of viagra purchase cialis online cheapest viagra prices find viagra on internet buy cheapest cialis online buy discount cialis online buy viagra from us buy cheapest cialis on line cialis cheap drug buy cialis online cheap find cialis no prescription required cialis us cheap viagra pill viagra free sample cheap viagra tablet viagra online cheap cheap cialis in usa cheap cialis without prescription order viagra no rx order viagra cheap online viagra prescription discount cialis overnight delivery cialis australia buy viagra on internet cialis buy drug order viagra in us cialis vendors cialis tablet viagra drug viagra tablet cialis cost cheap cialis tablets cialis discount buy cialis in us online pharmacy cialis sale cialis cheap viagra on internet buy viagra in us discount viagra overnight delivery 25 mg viagra cheap price cialis buy cheapest viagra cheap viagra no rx viagra online stores order generic cialis viagra online review best price viagra cialis overnight delivery cialis pills cialis online review buy cialis overnight delivery order viagra overnight delivery buy viagra no rx cheapest sildenafil citrate viagra free delivery viagra sale 50mg viagra buy cialis without prescription cialis prices tablet cialis find viagra without prescription viagra order buy cheap viagra online viagra pills cialis in bangkok cialis without prescription order discount viagra buy viagra in canada viagra bangkok lowest price for viagra pharmacy online cheap cialis online viagra for sale cialis cheap price discount viagra online impotence cure cheap cialis internet approved viagra pharmacy cialis approved cheap viagra from canada 10mg cialis viagra prices cialis in us compare viagra prices cialis vs viagra viagra internet cheapest viagra online buy cheapest viagra online online cialis viagra side effects generic cialis online buy cheap viagra order cheap cialis online viagra online viagra malaysia buy cheapest viagra on line order cialis no prescription required cialis buy approved cialis pharmacy viagra in bangkok cheap viagra pharmacy order cialis no prescription lowest price viagra cialis sale order cialis online order cialis on internet order discount viagra online best price cialis cialis no rx viagra buy online online pharmacy viagra cheap cialis pill cheap viagra in canada cialis online without prescription cheap viagra from uk cheap viagra internet find no rx viagra buy sildenafil in spain order cheap cialis order discount cialis impotence drugs buy cialis no rx purchase cialis without prescription viagra overnight delivery viagra discount no rx viagra buy generic cialis viagra without a prescription buy viagra us discount viagra no rx viagra soft tab viagra cheap price cialis order purchase viagra online cialis generic viagra information discount cialis without prescription viagra buy drug buy cheap cialis internet cialis internet 20mg cialis buy viagra cialis in australia viagra australia viagra buy generic drugs viagra from india buy viagra online cheap buy cialis cialis from canada pfizer viagra price of cialis cialis uk viagra overnight buy generic viagra online buying viagra online buy cialis online viagra for order cheap viagra no prescription viagra sales generic cialis buy viagra from canada best price for cialis order cialis cialis online pharmacy buying cialis where to order cialis cialis india

When I reviewed Peter Woit’s book “Not Even Wrong,” Several readers of this blog were puzzled by my claim that string theory does not attempt to reconcile Einstein’s theory of gravity and quantum theory. After all, isn’t string theory supposed to be realizing Einstein’s dream of unifying gravity with the other forces, into a final theory of everything, as Brian Greene, the Columbia University string theorist, reminds us in a New York Times op-ed article today? And if not, have the string theorists — and all those who popularize their work — been fooling the public all along? Here I will try to help correct the misconception, and also guess how it may have arisen.

String theory — if it turns out to be a well-defined, experimentally verified theory — would achieve an astonishing feat among others: it would “quantize” gravity. This means that the force of gravity would become for the first time a bona fide part of quantum physics. But that is not the same as saying that string theory would include a “quantized” general relativity. The versions of string theory that physicists consider promising would only include a radically simplified version of general relativity, Einstein’s theory of gravity.

Einstein posited that the geometry of space is not fixed and immutable, but that it changes responding to the presence of matter and energy. The presence of a heavy object — say, a star like the Sun — creates a “depression” in the fabric of space (often pictured as a heavy ball resting on a rubber sheet — the analogy by the way is not entirely accurate, but hopefully it gives the idea).

In turn, how matter and energy move in space is affected by the changing structure of space itself. The “force” of gravity is in a sense apparent, just like the centrifugal forces you feel riding a rollercoaster are the result of the rollercoaster being curved. (Again, the analogy is not exact, but please bear with me.)

In string theory, on the other hand, space is static. The theory is not yet capable of predicting that heavy objects curve space. In particular, the theory cannot explain mesmerizing phenomena like the formation of black holes (when the depression becomes infinitely deep), or the gravitational lensing astronomers see around galaxies. This problem is known as “background dependence,” meaning that string theory has to assume the shape of the universe as a “background” known and assigned once and for all(1).

Strings also seem to be very fastidious about what universe you put them into. Initially, string theory only seemed compatible with a “flat” universe. When physicists showed in the late 1990s that there were a few other possibilities for string-compatible universes, that was seen as a huge breakthrough. Still, it was like saying, string theory takes not only vanilla ice cream, but also chocolate and strawberry — but forget about Wavy Gravy or Cherry Garcia. The other string-compatible universes would be curved and evolving (as opposed to flat and static), but still as a background. Their evolution would be unaffected by what the strings do.

All of this is true of the approaches to string theory that people have been working on for the last 20 years. A different, “background independent” approach to string theory, called string field theory, was proposed in the mid-1980s, but most physicists soon abandoned it after discovering that it seemed to be unworkable.

At the same time, it is true as Greene says that a successful string theory would be able for the first time to model gravity in the language and mathematics of quantum theory — a problem that’s been nagging physicists ever since quantum theory became seen as expressing the fundamental nature of physics laws. Hopefully, a “single equation” would be found that explains all forces of nature — gravity, the weak and strong nuclear forces, the electromagnetic force, and even the mysterious dark energy.

Gravity according to string theory would still keep some of the great achievements of Einstein’s theory. It would be a force that propagates at the speed of light, rather than instantaneously as in Newton’s spooky “action at a distance.” And it would fully be consistent with Einstein’s earlier, “special” relativity, with its slowing clocks, shrinking measuring sticks, paradoxes of the twins, and so on.

Such a theory could in principle be accurate within a wide range of applicability, namely as long as you do experiments far from massive objects, and if you forget about trying to predict anything about the universe as a whole.

Would this achieve Einstein’s dream? Yes and no. Einstein certainly wanted to unify physics, but his version of the dream involved wrestling the other forces off the grip of quantum theory — which he helped father and then despised — rather than letting quantum theory get its grip on gravity. In today’s article, Greene does warn the reader on this point. But he seems to gloss over the fact that the problem of fully recovering general relativity would remain open.

Why and how have a lot of people come to believe such a misconception about string theory, namely, that string theorists are working on fully integrating general relativity into a unified theory? I believe it’s due in large part due to the perils of popularizing science. While physicists who also act as science communicators could be more open on this point, part of the fault could also be ours — the science journalists’.

If you have to express what string theory is to someone who knows nothing about physics, and if you must do that in one or two sentences, it is imperative that you give your reader (or the listener or T.V. spectator) a lifesaver to grasp onto. At least some of the words you are going to say must be familiar to the reader, or else you’ve lost them. The only word that is guaranteed to sound familiar to most people is Einstein. The reader will ask, what is physics? Oh, it’s what Einstein did. At least I have a mental pigeonhole where to put this guy.

At the same time, the need to avoid overwhelming the reader almost always forces you to make stark choices on what to leave out, as all of us who write about science will attest. So Greene was right to somehow mention Einstein’s name in there, and probably also not to go too much into the details.

Still, all of us who communicate science could probably try harder to avoid misleading the reader. “Whenever you are translating mathematical work into natural language, there’s inevitably going to be some imprecisions,” New York Times science writer George Johnson once said to me in a telephone interview. However, he said, “I like to subtly work in a disclaimer, sometimes, just to remind people that — especially when you write about physics, and quantum mechanics particularly — a really precise description that would do complete justice to the phenomena is going to require differential equations.” That’s what Johnson often does in his books, and that’s some advice we science communicators could all try to follow. (Read the complete Q&A with George Johnson)


(1) Here’s how Stephon Alexander, a theoretical physicist at the University of Pennsylvania, explained this to me in more technical terms:

When one quantizes string theory, it is done on a fixed space-time background. This background is usually Minkowski space time. Therefore the metric is fixed. Most string theories have another symmetry which is called conformal invariance (observables are invariant under dilations (magnification)) In order for the quantum theory to respect this symmetry and be consistent, something called the Beta function must vanish -the Beta function is a quantum measure of the deviation from conformal invariance. It turns out that the condition for a vanishing beta function is exactly the Einstein Equations. However, even though the Einstein field equations are present, their solutions are only consistent with string theory for the background which gave the beta functions, Minkowski space. Other space-times are difficult to obtain in string theory because most usually break supersymmetry and the gravity theories are supergravity theories which only satisfy supersymmetric gravitational configurations.

2 Comments »

  1. Nice post, Davide. You certainly cleared up some of my misconceptions about what String Theory is doing.

    I’m going to read it over again, and maybe we can talk about it next week. (I took off today to go skateboarding).

    -Buzz Skyline

    Comment by James R — October 20, 2006 @ 5:22 pm

  2. I’m sorry, but this is wrong. String perturbation theory makes sense (although can be difficult to quantize) on any background that satisfies the Einstein field equations, not just Minkowski space. Even in this context, string theory does explain “that heavy objects curve space”, at least perturbatively.

    Within more nonperturbative approaches (the main example being AdS/CFT), one can go much further. In AdS/CFT, there is no background dependence except at the boundary of spacetime.

    You also say that “Initially, string theory only seemed compatible with a “flat” universe. When physicists showed in the late 1990s that there were a few other possibilities for string-compatible universes, that was seen as a huge breakthrough”. The existence of multiple solutions was well-known back to the dawn of string theory; as mentioned above, string perturbation theory is compatible with any solution to the appropriate Einstein field equations. What was accomplished in the late 1990s was the issue of moduli fixing. The previous geometries all could deform continuously in such a way that led to massless fields that we do not observe. The accomplishment was to get rid of those fields and to make plausible that one could obtain solutions with a positive cosmological constant.

    Comment by Aaron Bergman — October 23, 2006 @ 5:41 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Home : : Exclusives : : Portfolio : : About
Copyright 2003-2007 Davide Castelvecchi all rights reserved